Read the entire thread, all 21 pages. Saved every single picture as well. Well done.
In regards to "to USD, or to not USD, that is the question" (er something along those lines). What happened here Les? Did you simply begin changing your preferences over time? (damned humans, so predictable in their unpredictability ... heheh
) It seems you went from supporting the use of the "standard type" hydraulic telescopics of the pre-2001 R6 (and dismissing the R1 USD front end) to pining for the very thing you considered overkill. These things happen, I understand that as well as the next person. However I am just curious about the reason for change of heart. Is it mostly aesthetics or prestige, or is there a performance gain that you wish to exploit?
(below, "Racer" asked you since you were going to all the trouble to hang a set of R6 forks why not go a little further and use a set of inverteds -aka "Upside Down" or "USD". Your reply......).
Racer Too modern looking, plus I am riding her as a leisure bike Sunday afternoons to Matlock and Tuesday Nights Scarcliffe classic bike meet, and the local racing Cadwell Park Mallory Park and Donnington park.
The upside down forks can be a pain to set up if you get them off a model that is vastly differant to the XS650.
The standard forks with progressive springs are just as good as the upside downies,,,unless you are buying Ohlins and then you need a bank loan
Leslie
(above) .... that was quoted from page 4 of this thread I believe. And (below) quoted from this very page.
Cheers Wolfie & leader, I am spoilt for choice with the USD forks with radial callipers, keep an eye on my post.
Leslie
So are you simply just sick for trick, or is there a believable rationale that you've talked yourself into? If so, you MUST share your secret with your also-sick brothers-in-arms here in the forum. We all know that we have a horrible weak spot for anything two-wheeled with an engine. If you have cracked the code of how to deliver believable rationale that supports our addictions to these two wheeled mistresses, then you OWE it to your brothers to educate us on how to put our minds at ease with our choices to spend $800-odd bones for that big bore kit, or the Terabux spent on those Mikuni round slides and the Cheney fully suspended racing frame that just so happens to cost exactly as much money as we do not have.
So good sir, if you have deciphered the uncrackable code of how to convince ourselves (and our significant others) that we really do need that rephasing kit MORE than we need to pay this month's rent, you most certainly owe it to us all to share your discovery with your suffering and quite sick brothers.
(below) it never ends, does it!
Can't help thinking, that if you're going to upgrade the front suspension to that extent, then maybe, an equally up to date (ie Monoshock) rear-end might be the way to go.
nvr, I know what you mean, I think I am on the limit with the aesthetics to achieve my modern classic look every time I modernise part of her.
I think the mono shock option is just a tad to far, as her rear end with the 70s hammerheads and a classic kwaka 80s ali swing arm would I think would compliment the modern USD radial calliper forks.
The R6 forks which I fitted although modern appear not to differ too much from the original XS forks although the twin disc modern callipers do.
The design is fluid as long I don't turn her into a ultra modern street tool.
Leslie
Hey, why not? I mean a few more this-n-thats and you'll have yourself one fine Mule.
Kidding of course. I'm making fun of the fact that those of us inflicted with the same disease can all relate to what you are going through. These projects are never truly "done", are they!
All of this joking around, and we only just met.
Seriously Leslie, one very nice piece of workmanship and realization of the vision in your mind's eye. Well done. Great execution of an idea. And it may end up being a nice test bed since you are tip-toeing into commercial fabrication of high performance parts.
However it isn't a tracker, really. It's kinda a set of clubmans away from being a cafe type bike. Which is what Racer meant when he said you were building a "good old US hot rod". It's a great general purpose bike, with nods to naked bikes, streetfighters, street trackers, flat trackers, cafe bikes, motard racers, dirt bikes/crossers, ..... It's part of what makes it unique, it's so non-descript. Which is a great thing in that it has few limits and a broad use scope.
A sortof modern UJM.
If I may spout off on the USD thing for a moment. Unless one is going for a modern look to their 35 year old bike, my own opinion is that the mass-produced mig-welded mild steel tube stock frames these bikes were built on are not anything near a suitable platform for things like USD forks and mono rear ends. I mean the frames are basically boiled noodles compared to the rigidity and engineering strength of these modern components. I'm sortof a follower of Pops Yoshimura, and his philosophies on such things were to retain a high degree of total balance throughout the bike's design. No one part is any stronger than any other one part. Stress and loads are distributed as evenly as possible throughout the space frame. That said, the USD forks and triangulated swingarms of modern designs are not connected to a solid foundation to work from. The frame simply wiggles in between two very stout ends. And keep in mind that these are simply opinions, just the ideas of someone.
Tony Foale is another person that I sortof admire for his ideas on handling, he's another fella that is all about the balance. He's made stock GPZs handle like prototypes by triangulating the frame just above the swingarm pivot and behind the engine. Even with smallish (by today's standards) telescopics up front the bike was still not able to exploit the full potential of the suspension even after the frame had been shored up in a very well thought out manner. I can only imagine how much of the R1 front end's strengths are left on the table with a stock 35 year old mass produced mig welded mild steel tube frame.
On the other hand, USD front ends can look simply amazing on certain builds. So if the choice is based on appearances, it's difficult to argue with the trick-factor of a USD front end.
In the end, it's your bike and you may (and should) do whatever it is you wish with it! Regardless of what over-yakkity goofers like myself say to you!