Rephasing, What is it?

can't remember what he used for carbs or other engine mods but it sure sounded good.

As I recall, Scout has stock carburetors on it. I remember seeing the paper from him running it on the dynamometer. I don't remember how much HP it made, but it made it beyond the redline. I think his crank is welded. The HP number was very impressive as I remember.
 
- this is a tic of mine - i love rephased motors...yes this is changing the crank set up so the pistons dont travel together...the advantage is that you dont lose energy when both pistons are at TDC as 1 piston is always mid stroke when the other is TDC..ie rephase-when one piston is not moving (TDC) the other is at max velocity (mid stroke)...removes the search for energy to overcome inertia when both pistons are stopped together (non-rephased TDC)
- so there is a power saving
- this leads also to less vibration as the motor runs smoother
- better responsiveness
- slightly torquier
- if you do this weld the pins to the flywheels...balancing helps too

- there are 2 ways of doing this

- split the crank in the middle-rotate the right hand side 3 splines and press back together...277 rephase
- split the crank, replace the 2nd flywheel from the right with a slightly modified 3rd flywheel (remove 21mm from the pin boss where the cam sprocket seats), use a 270° pin and press together 90° out of phase...270 rephase

- both of these processes require a suitably modified camshaft and a cam-driven ignition system...a good time to consider installing a permanant magnet alternator and dual lobe points cam

- in my opinion yamaha missed a golden opportunity to produce a truly extraordinary motor by turning this idea down...i have done this and highly recommend this to anyone interested in spending the effort...virtually all modern-day parallel twins are built this way

xsstandard.gif
xsrehase.gif
Do you know of someone that can do the up grade?
Thanks
 
TT1, how was that cam in performance? I have the exact cam, Trying to decide if I want to
use it or dig deep for the megacycle cam.
have the heidens cam on my 277 rephased bike , very happy with it , very good over the range of revs but better on top end , was told very simmiler to the xs1 and2 cam but dont know personly
 
Has anybody ever set the balance factor on a 277 to 53 percent? I'm putting together another engine and was wondering how much of an improvement it would give.
 
lets cut the bs. rephasing reduces vibration that is its ONLY advantage. the net résistance is EXACTLY the same as stock and there is ZERO increase in torque. If you want a little more torque with the same cc go with the original design rod /piston, if you want a lot more, Wiseco sells cc's

The paint can shaker motor is part of the personality of the bike; get a W650/800 if you want a jap psuedo retro BRIT with nicer manners; its your money but IMHO it would be better spent with that choice.
I rephased an xs 15 years ago, to 277°. Big 750cc block on it, reworked head and cam. Ran great for years, and many miles, and happy smiles. Wanted more, so i sold it to an xs enthousiast, who loves it. I bought myself a Triumph Thruxton 1200 R, which i absolutely love, and it has the 270° crank, and much more than any xs ever will. Suffice to say, i'm not bothered with rephasing xs's anymore. Looking into rephasing an inline four cylinder now.(cause i believe yam's got it wrong with the R1 😜🤣)
 
If I understand you correctly, crossplane is wrong for the four cylinder bike and correct for the two cylinder bike. :shrug:

I think you're just one of those who can't leave well enough alone. You're in good company here. ;)
Indeed, crossplane is good for a V8, not an inline four.(a 270° twin imo isn't a crossplane crank, because it is L-shaped from the side) An inline four should be rephased to two pairs(L+R) of 180° twins, that in turn are 90° out of phase to each other. Like Helmut Fath did with his URS engine.
That way, secondary imbalance is way less than sticking a V8 crank in an inline four.

And, yes, i am one of those, who can't leave well enough alone.... 🤣
Does that even exist, well enough? 😜🤣🤣
 

Definition of let well enough alone

: to stop changing something that is already good enough

- The Merriam-Webster Dictionary
 

Definition of let well enough alone

: to stop changing something that is already good enough

- The Merriam-Webster Dictionary
Sorry, mate, don't know the definition.
Love tinkering with engines.
Always room for improvement. Long-bang 4, crossplane 4, without innovative thinkers, we'd never have those. 😜
 
I thought I was a minority in thinking that but I also think it's a function of most people rephasing are going for performance at the same time so I don't see many or any with bigger mufflers that would tame out the sound of it. Most bikes I know of with a similar crankshaft timing (Ducati, FZ-07, newer Triumphs) tend to have either 2 into 1 systems or a catalytic converter or X pipe that functions as a 2-1-2 setup. It seems to take out a lot of the bark and popping and just leave a slightly aggressive but still deep and smooth exhaust note to it.

Something like a 2 into 1 setup on a rephased XS with an 18" or so muffler would probably sound amazing.
You're right!
I made a high level 2-1 for mine, with an oval racing silencer(laser/booster) of a dr-big, and it sounded awesome!
 
Also, please remember, that ~$700 mark does NOT include the new ignition you now need or any other necessary rebuild parts. You can add another $300-900 to that $700 estimate
 
Also, please remember, that ~$700 mark does NOT include the new ignition you now need or any other necessary rebuild parts. You can add another $300-900 to that $700 estimate
Yes indeed! New ignition required. I highly recommend only the VAPE system: $700.
And a Barnett clutch, and Kibble-White valves, guides & springs and........
http://www.hoosracing.com/new650750engineparts.html

I can't give you a total $$, as I try not to keep track (on purpose):shootme:;)
 
Last Crank I did was with my labor ($450.00) was $1500.OO NEW RODS, NEW MAIN BEARINGS, NEW PIN AND BUSHINHS. Parts are sonic cleaned, trued and welded pins. Cams we use Megacycle cost more but worth it they are a real cam company, they don't cut the cam in half. never see one cut that was right. They run $744.00 now. Ignitions we always used Vape. crank timed adjustable advance. they run $707.00 and you can buy direct from them. This is all top of the line parts and service. Roger has 50 years in doing cranks.
 
Last edited:
So JP... since you own both, what are your impressions of the 277 vs 180° engine?
@jpdevol
 
Last edited:
So JP... since you own both, what are your impressions of the 277 vs 180° engine?
@jpdevol
Hmm. My problem - in giving a decent answer - is that each is on a very different chassis that get ridden differently. The rephase maybe doesn't rev as quickly (it's geared taller too), but seems like it likes higher rpm better than stock. I actually get a little more vibration on the bobber, but the floorboards and bars are solid mount and the tracker retains stock rubber isolators there.:shrug:

If I was building another tracker or cafe, I'd certainly rephase it - someday (3 builds away, min. lol)
 
Last Crank I did was with my labor ($450.00) was $1500.OO NEW RODS, NEW MAIN BEARINGS, NEW PIN AND BUSHINHS. Parts are sonic cleaned, trued and welded pins. Cams we use Megacycle cost more but worth it they are a real cam company, they don't cut the cam in half. never see one cut that was right. They run $744.00 now. Ignitions we always used Vape. crank timed adjustable advance. they run $707.00 and you can buy direct from them. This is all top of the line parts and service. Roger has 50 years in doing cranks.
What's your turn around time on a crank rebuild?
 
Back
Top