By my calculation, I'm 62 and I feel like a pup. Thanks!happy 61st Just a pup yet
By my calculation, I'm 62 and I feel like a pup. Thanks!happy 61st Just a pup yet
Damn Catholic grade school mathBy my calculation, I'm 62 and I feel like a pup. Thanks!
If you get the fundamental purpose of the weapons of war, then you won't be torn about admiring them. They become admirable. At some level Buzzword realizes that about his guns. It causes an internal conflict that he resolves by thinking everyone is conflicted. But people who know what they are doing are not. The secret is to use your brain and eliminate the inconsistency. It may cause you to change your thinking, but that's better than stumbling around being "a walking contradiction".
P.S. Getting their purpose is also what makes it obvious when they're being misused. Very valuable, not that we can do much about it.
After doing some digging it looks like they may be making their own jets ?I had no idea that they were still producing F-15’s and F16 variants ( the F-21 ). I just read about the Indian Air Force opening up competition for their purchase of 114 fighters to replace their aging Soviet fleet. Boeing and Lockheed Martin are in the hunt as well as the French and Swiss.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/sebast...15ex-eagles-to-india-faces-stiff-competition/After doing some digging it looks like they may be making their own jets ?
I had no idea that they were still producing F-15’s and F16 variants ( the F-21 ). I just read about the Indian Air Force opening up competition for their purchase of 114 fighters to replace their aging Soviet fleet. Boeing and Lockheed Martin are in the hunt as well as the French and Swiss.
After doing some digging it looks like they may be making their own jets ?
I'd guess it would be the Swedes (rather than the Swiss)
Switzerland - Sweden....same thing. They both start with S.
And GE in the UK.Things in the sky: Guardian (angel), Thunderbolt, Thunderjet, Thunderchief... Rainbow.
Lightning was taken by Lockheed.
Tomorrow on the VFT.
View attachment 183539
Without delving too far into philosophy - or politics for that matter - I can certainly appreciate a well-designed mechanical thing from the slide rule era for what it is, irrespective of its origins or intent.
OK
Perhaps of interest There was a couple of spectacular Landings.
Not all of them with the pilot still seated
Fighter Jet as Earth moving Equipment
The saying --- every landing you can walk away from is a good one not sure about this one.
Most of it is probably classified . Some blame the pilot others the
computer aerodynamic control system not being dialed in.
As with Boeing MAX 8 maybe.
Just from watching the video, the pilot got into a PIO (pilot induced oscillation). When it turns sideways you can see the afterburner is lit... meaning the pilot was trying to power his way out of it. Another 20 ft of altitude or a half second quicker on the throttle and he might just have pulled it off.That Gripen crash was a software glitch - the airplane flies very well now that they have fixed it....we hope....
Just from watching the video, the pilot got into a PIO (pilot induced oscillation). When it turns sideways you can see the afterburner is lit... meaning the pilot was trying to power his way out of it. Another 20 ft of altitude or a half second quicker on the throttle and he might just have pulled it off.
The YF-22 had a similar crash... although that one had little damage... it flew again. On the -22, the software used too much gain on the elevators, allowing (inducing) the PIO. I'm guessing that's what happened here.