thebrick5150
XS650 New Member
New here and getting ready to build a chopper and wanted to know has anyone tried or has done a reverse head? Like some have done on the old triumphs.
I see what your saying but would it get to hot to run properly or do long trips on? it would still get some air flow.Yeah, that's a great idea--put the hot side of the head in back and get it out of the air stream to keep things nice and toasty.
Oh, come on Griz ...
You're completely ignoring the extra power boost afforded by the ram air effect of having those carbs facing the incoming air flow. And, I'll reveal a little known tuning secret that with the head reversed you can go to 40MM carbs on both sides, which takes advantage of more incoming air. Of course, to balance the system the pro tuners then fit 2 inch straight through exhaust pipes. (unless it's a 750, then then you go to 2 and a quarter inch i.d., especially if you have a hot cam)
Also, everyone knows that keeping the carburetor side of the spark plugs cooler (which is impossible on the stock setup!) adds serious horsepower.
Further, you have to take into consideration that the higher temperatures - even if it nudges toward the detonation zone - will provide more complete burning of the fuel - air mixture for even MORE power!
You know all this stuff. It's selfish of you to keep it from those wishing to extract full performance from their machines.
I trust you'll be more forthcoming in the future.
I'm reminded of the rear cylinder on my old panhead, rear exhaust, forward intake, shrouded cooling air that's substantially hotter than ambient. Not ideal, but they've survived.
I designed a stealth cowl air pressurized intake system on my 327 vega. Reportedly yields 6% hp boost at 120 mph, almost 10% at 145, you could feel it...
MPH/FPS-----Ram psi--------Ram "HG-------Ram " water-------MM water
--70/103-------.086#---------- .18"---------------2.40"------------- 4.47mm
--80/117-------.113------------ .23---------------3.13---------------5.84
--90/132-------.143------------ .29---------------3.97---------------7.40
100/147-------.176------------ .36---------------4.90---------------9.13
110/161-------.213------------ .44---------------5.93--------------11.05
120/176-------.254------------ .52---------------7.05--------------13.15
130/191-------.298------------ .61---------------8.30--------------15.43
140/205-------.346------------ .70---------------9.60--------------17.90
150/220-------.397------------ .81--------------11.02-------------20.55
160/235-------.451------------ .92--------------12.54-------------23.38
170/249-------.510------------1.04--------------14.15-------------26.39
180/264-------.571------------1.17--------------15.19-------------29.59
190/279-------.636------------1.30--------------17.70-------------32.96
200/293-------.705------------1.44--------------19.59-------------36.53
210/308-------.778------------1.59--------------21.63-------------40.33
220/323-------.852------------1.74--------------23.67-------------44.20
230/337-------.934------------1.91--------------25.60-------------47.70
That was an old tip published 30 years ago, for street setups. It compared cowl induction (base of windshield, higher than flat-plate pressure of .00286 lbs/sqft/mph) against typical under-hood open-round air filter setups, and also accounts for the significant temperature difference of the induction air. Of course, the bowl venting had to be contained in the induction zone.
But pressure is a statisical thing, and I like to quantize the effect. The air molecules bouncing around me, sitting in my lazyboy at 80°, are moving at an average velocity of 1100 ft/min. But, at any given instant, some are moving over 2000 mph, some barely moving at all (think of the bouncing ball 'kinetic' motion screensavers). Moving thru the air gives you a pressure value, but that's just a summation of the molecular impact forces. Suppose you could separate the hi-velocity molecules from the slow ones, and order their velocity vector, as in Maxwell's demons? Without any moving parts? A device to do that was invented in the late 1800's, and gives insight to a different perspective of the gas laws. Enuff, net crashes out here and tapping on this tablet is frustrating...
I have a passing understanding of Maxwell's demons. If I figure out a way to separate and isolate hi-velocity molecules and find a useful application for them for motorcycles, I'll be sure to let you know after I patent it.
That being said, the best you're going to do with a XS650, with a seal airbox and ram air, is to probably bring the airbox pressure close to that of ambient. Weather fluctuations will cause a greater change in air pressure than any other type of system would.