Not really about electrical power. Hell, not even electrical per se.
More to do with computing. And computing's driving the future, right?
More to do with computing. And computing's driving the future, right?
Not necessarily.
They also perform well when the majority of your journeys tend to be local. We have a range of 45 miles in the summer and 30 in the winter.
That's been enough to do just over 70% by distance and 85% by time on battery power. The balance is when we venture further afield.
We get an average fuel consumption of 145 to the (UK) gallon.
The latest version of our car can do 60 miles on a charge so that should improve the percentage travelled on battery.
Heard a good interview this week with the head of some UK motor industry confederation that govt targets are distorting the market to the severe disadvantage of that industry. They are already required to sell 22% all electric by value and a steeply rising percentage until no 'polluting' vehicles are sold by, think it's 2030.Hi Max / All:
. . . to comply with government regulations . . .
Pete, I responded to your post #793 in mine of #798 the quote relates to what you had written in #805.Hi Max / All:
You appear to misunderstand some of my points in post #793 and failed to notice some others.
That $7.5B is money approved through congress. The key word in that is "approved." That's NOT money spent, it's money that WILL BE SPENT when all's said and done. Fact check FALSE by ABC News.
No date on that statement, but I stand corrected?$7.5 billion allocated through the 2021 law to build a network of charging stations across the U.S., There are currently 214 operational chargers in 12 states
Source? how many of those are from this federal program?1000 new charging stations are coming on line every week.
Came from the ABC News link I posted. didn't say how many are from the fed funding.Source? how many of those are from this federal program?
Agree, but neither is misleading headlines like this one....You may have noticed I'm NOT anti EV. But unicorn farts aren't going to get this change going.
That was true about a year ago. I'd suspect there's a few more at this point. Here's a link to the NEVI website. Lot's of info on spending and links to state websites detailing their progress on charging corridors........progress on the network has been slow. Ohio and New York are the only states that have opened charging stations under the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure program. .....
3 years in, there should be a map of operating charging stations the act has created. Show me?Came from the ABC News link I posted. didn't say how many are from the fed funding.
Agree, but neither is misleading headlines like this one....
View attachment 340773
Prolly one of the worst things out there to kill support for EV's in general and chargers in particular is misleading claims that do nothing but sour the general public on EV's. Public dissatisfaction ended our involvement in the Vietnam war. Public support put Armstrong on the Moon in '69. Public support or dissatisfaction (still) plays a large role in massive programs, as it should. What are we to make of a public that's (intentionally) ill informed?
That was true about a year ago. I'd suspect there's a few more at this point. Here's a link to the NEVI website. Lot's of info on spending and links to state websites detailing their progress on charging corridors.
https://driveelectric.gov/state-plans/
A towing company was quoted as saying EVs out of a charge were 60% of it's business. ( I don't have the source on that one).
three years in you say;(Deleted to avoid politics) has set a goal of creating 500,000 such chargers by 2030.
There are currently 214 operational chargers in 12 states that have been funded through the law, with 24,800 projects underway across the country, according to the Federal Highway Administration.
Skull much to most of the USA experiences significant periods of "winter" lets say below the freezing point of water You saying EV's aren't appropriate for these areas. To most auto owners significant is any time period that involves completing their daily work commute.The cold climate plays havoc with EV's range. Questions that come to mind with the 60%.
How many people leave with insufficient charge to get to the next station
How many don't take the loss of distance due to cold conditions into consideration.
How many dion't do their research on the next station in their trip.
Human error could b a major factor in the 60%, then that figure is used to discredit EV's in turn public backlash, and used for political purposes.
Should EV sales be pushed in such cold climates.???.... Be ok if it was for a week or two each year but that far north or south