Just out of curiosity - Airplane Guys

Jim

Beyond the edge is the unknown. Here be Dragons
Top Contributor
XS650.com Supporter
Messages
13,875
Reaction score
53,485
Points
813
Location
Kansas City Mo.
Interesting. EMP testing never dawned on me. It's still there. Google Maps....


1675995899386.png
 

Adamc

XS650 MEDDLER
Top Contributor
XS650.com Supporter
Messages
1,445
Reaction score
6,016
Points
513
Location
Wales
WTF???
View attachment 235333


I had NO idea what's going on here.
Hint; the scaffold is all wood.

Atlas
This was on ABANDONED ENGINEERING TV show recently
It was built to test high level electromagnetic impulse resistance on aircraft.
The wire arrays surrounding the wooden platform provide the powerful electro pulses.
No doubt lightening strike tests too.
 

Jim

Beyond the edge is the unknown. Here be Dragons
Top Contributor
XS650.com Supporter
Messages
13,875
Reaction score
53,485
Points
813
Location
Kansas City Mo.
Curious... F16 is not built to withstand carrier landings, doesnt have a hook, is (generally) not piloted by a Naval Aviator trained in carrier approach and landing.
Russia doesn't own an operational carrier, let alone the 2 pictured. The Kuznetsov (it's sole carrier) has been in dry dock for like a gazillion yrs. and isn't capable of landing aircraft on it's deck.
F-16's do indeed have a tail hook.

It's CGI.
 

46th Georgia

XS650 Guru
Top Contributor
XS650.com Supporter
Messages
1,385
Reaction score
4,844
Points
263
Location
The Okefenokee Swamp
Russia doesn't own an operational carrier, let alone the 2 pictured. The Kuznetsov (it's sole carrier) has been in dry dock for like a gazillion yrs. and isn't capable of landing aircraft on it's deck.
F-16's do indeed have a tail hook.

It's CGI.
Although I don't have your background, even I thought it didn't look right either.
 

Raymond

likes to play with old motorbikes
Top Contributor
XS650.com Supporter
Messages
2,624
Reaction score
12,771
Points
513
Location
Scottish Borders
I seem to remember a bit of a kerfuffle when the Kutzenov and a small flotilla of Russian vessels proceeded through the English Channel on its way to deploy off Syria a few years back. For them as don't know, despite the name, the English Channel is open for international shipping. But I suspect neither Britain nor France was very happy about the Russians sailing through.
 

Kevin Werner

Amatuer
Top Contributor
XS650.com Supporter
Messages
3,812
Reaction score
16,063
Points
513
Location
Sheboygan, WI
I seem to remember a bit of a kerfuffle when the Kutzenov and a small flotilla of Russian vessels proceeded through the English Channel on its way to deploy off Syria a few years back. For them as don't know, despite the name, the English Channel is open for international shipping. But I suspect neither Britain nor France was very happy about the Russians sailing through.
I am sure there was a lot of escort (watching:)) from a close distance. When I went through Gibralter on the Coral Sea CV43 in '85 we were hounded by Russian "Trawlers" (small boats with alot of antennae) and of course a "Bear" Tu95 did a low recon pass as an F/A 18 did close escort.
 

Jim

Beyond the edge is the unknown. Here be Dragons
Top Contributor
XS650.com Supporter
Messages
13,875
Reaction score
53,485
Points
813
Location
Kansas City Mo.
Short field landing?
All US Air Force fighters have an arresting hook. All (most?) Air Force bases have a runway with a BAK-4 arresting system. They're used when the fighter has problems such as hydraulic/brake failure. In other words it's an emergency only system.
Unlike Navy jets.. which can raise and lower the hook, Air Force jets can only lower the hook. Once it's deployed, the only way to raise it is one or two mechanics pushing it back in place.



Even the big ass F-111 had a hook....


 
Top