The initially inserted sketch has now been amended to the one shown above, following adsvice from GLJ regarding the 700/760 dims. So all should hopefully be good now. All thanks to you GLJ.
Damn, beat me to it! I have solid models and made a drawing off them too.From the pics in post #11 I've quickly drawn up this sketch. I've converted into metric too and approximated the metric dims to nearest 0.1mm (4 thou) which is going to be close enough. If I've misread the dims let me know and I will amend the sketch.
View attachment 368830
Yes, me too. I've also done a 3D model, though the 2D dwg was just a quick knock up.Damn, beat me to it! I have solid models and made a drawing off them too.
From the pics in post #11 I've quickly drawn up this sketch. I've converted into metric too and approximated the metric dims to nearest 0.1mm (4 thou) which is going to be close enough. If I've misread the dims let me know and I will amend the sketch.
The corrected one is the one that shows the large part with a waist dia of 760Manny, which drawing is the corrected one in your post?
I'll remove the wrong one to avoid confusion
Have not been following this thread real close but just a little idea that came to me when I saw the picture of the marks from the guard rubbing on the harness. What about making that area a bit larger but then put a flat spot on one side to give clearance for the harness? Kind of a D shape at that end?
Time for second cup of coffee so maybe that's not a good idea, but at least it wasn't thought of after second glass of an adult beverage so maybe?
Pretty sure that's not allowed. Even an admin can't do that. Best thing to do is quote in a new comment and delete the non-quoted one.I don't know how to add a quote after posting during an edit.
That's gonna leave just 12.5 thou of tube wall. Hmmm...instead of the .700 diameter being turned down, it will be 1" diameter the whole length, but with a step milled out .050" from the end, so that it is D-shaped when looking at that end.
I have the GLJ version and it works perfectly. Not sure about any reverse-engineered parts?

Will be interesting to see how well the printed parts are able to resist wear.I have the GLJ version and it works perfectly. Not sure about any reverse-engineered parts?
Pretty sure that's not allowed. Even an admin can't do that. Best thing to do is quote in a new comment and delete the non-quoted one.
No, the tube wall would be the same. It'll be as if someone milled a flat just on one side instead of turning it.That's gonna leave just 12.5 thou of tube wall. Hmmm...
Out of interest, the overall length of both parts, being 2.800, is this the exact dimension from the C clip to the back face of the engine cover?
Oh I can guarantee a PLA version would fall apart before I'd make it around the block. It's very easy to sand and file smooth.Will be interesting to see how well the printed parts are able to resist wear.
Delrin wasn't a random choice.
https://xometry.pro/en/topic/the-closest-material-to-delrin-for-3d-printing/
Oh I can guarantee a PLA version would fall apart before I'd make it around the block. It's very easy to sand and file smooth.
Maybe Greg just lets everyone else make them and collects royalties…I could in theory make my own at work, but honestly I'd feel like I'm stealing someone's design and potential profit even though he put all the info out here. Just seems wrong. To me, anyways.