The finding neutral discussion is timely as I made an interesting discovery this past summer and just verified it again last weekend during my ride that I thought I would share.
Some of you may recall last summer (I think at the time I had posted up an issue I was having with a stiff clutch/lever issue and finally realized that I stupidly forgot to simply oil my clutch cable)...anyways, along with getting the clutch to move like butter (which it truly does now--it's so light and easy to pull) I also experimented with my shifter which I didn't really discuss since it wasn't part of the issue at the time...and here's the interesting part: I have been running with rearsets for quite some time now, and while I could shift just fine...I too had an issue with finding neutral, especially when hot...but this was not new to the rearsets as it was also kind of an issue when it was stock too. Since I had a few extra shifters in my box of parts I decided to try something and swap out the smallish shifter that mounts on the shift rod (and connects to the linkage of my rearsets) with a longer one. You can see the original one I had in this picture (it's black and is approx. 2" long)
I ended up using one that's closer to 3.5"- 4" (I'm not near my garage so don't have exact measurements but imagine the black shifter part in my pic being double it's length), and my finding was that not only could I shift WAY easier, but I've yet to NOT FIND NEUTRAL. It just dawned on me when I saw the last few posts on this thread pop up, and thinking back on my ride this past weekend-- that since I made the change, neutral has not been missed nor have I needed to rock the bike while sitting at a light or rev it slightly to find neutral. And that begs the question... why? I have to think that leverage and the ability to turn the shift rod with greater force is it work here...but I'm not sure the physics/nature of the forces to know how to calculate the variances of a rearset with a taller/longer "lever" vs. the stock shifter...perhaps it's nothing? But I thought I'd share and see if that adds to the mystery.
Some of you may recall last summer (I think at the time I had posted up an issue I was having with a stiff clutch/lever issue and finally realized that I stupidly forgot to simply oil my clutch cable)...anyways, along with getting the clutch to move like butter (which it truly does now--it's so light and easy to pull) I also experimented with my shifter which I didn't really discuss since it wasn't part of the issue at the time...and here's the interesting part: I have been running with rearsets for quite some time now, and while I could shift just fine...I too had an issue with finding neutral, especially when hot...but this was not new to the rearsets as it was also kind of an issue when it was stock too. Since I had a few extra shifters in my box of parts I decided to try something and swap out the smallish shifter that mounts on the shift rod (and connects to the linkage of my rearsets) with a longer one. You can see the original one I had in this picture (it's black and is approx. 2" long)

I ended up using one that's closer to 3.5"- 4" (I'm not near my garage so don't have exact measurements but imagine the black shifter part in my pic being double it's length), and my finding was that not only could I shift WAY easier, but I've yet to NOT FIND NEUTRAL. It just dawned on me when I saw the last few posts on this thread pop up, and thinking back on my ride this past weekend-- that since I made the change, neutral has not been missed nor have I needed to rock the bike while sitting at a light or rev it slightly to find neutral. And that begs the question... why? I have to think that leverage and the ability to turn the shift rod with greater force is it work here...but I'm not sure the physics/nature of the forces to know how to calculate the variances of a rearset with a taller/longer "lever" vs. the stock shifter...perhaps it's nothing? But I thought I'd share and see if that adds to the mystery.