History

kopcicle

antidisestablishmentarian
Top Contributor
Messages
740
Reaction score
1,045
Points
143
Location
47.35507458162953, -122.14176616120587
The following story was written for the Vintage Japanese Motorcycle Club Journal after some, partly incorrect facts were published about this bike, which is becoming (rightfully) more popular now everywhere. Later-on the Dutch XS650 Club (750 members), published it as well.

“True Story of the Yamaha XS650 series”


In Europe the first model seen in some quantity was the XS1F. The Netherlands received the first batch in May 1971. Prior to this a few of the now famous green XS1’s were shipped to Holland, Germany, Switzerland and Austria, for evaluation purposes.

The information hereunder was compiled for me by my Japanese colleague and friend "Dottore" S. Iwasa, who was chassis development engineer for the Toyota cars mentioned later on and who started working for Yamaha in 1959. An old friend of his in Japan sent us the information.




XS650 (XS1)

1) Summary of production.


The XS650, the largest 4-stroke motorcycle ever made by Yamaha, was launched during the Tokyo Motorshow in October 1969 and was commercialised in March 1970. Production ceased in the spring of 1980, bringing the total production to nearly 300.000 units.

2) Specification


Engine 4-stroke, OHC, Parallel twin, displacement 653 ccm. Transmission 5 speed gearbox, chain final drive. Etc.

3) Objective of the development

The 650 XS1 was the first 4 stroke engine motorcycle ever developed by Yamaha and also the first large displacement engine. Prior to this one the largest engine was the YR-1 Yamaha 2-stroke twin.



In 1965 Honda launched the CB450, which created the gateway to the big motorcycle category for the Japanese manufacturers.
In the U.S. market, where pollution problems were already under discussion, a cleaner motorcycle was preferred and on the other hand 2-stroke motorcycles trailing blue smoke were not getting well accepted.

But more important was that market surveys showed an increasing trend towards bigger motorcycles. The target for Yamaha therefore was clear:



* Light weight and high performance
* Easy handling at level of Yamaha's 350 cc
* For future high engine output SOHC will be better than OHV
* Transferring technology of Toyota 2000 GT engine (designed by Yamaha) to this motorcycle engine



4) Project team


First Engineering group: General Manager Mr. Daisuke Tanaka, Mr. K. Morinaga (who later became the originator of the 5-valve system , Deltabox and other technology of the mid 80's Yamaha's and who sadly passed away) and Mr. H. Sakuma.

Engine development: Chief S. Izumizawa, K. Igarashi, M. Arai.
Chassis development: Chief Y. Hironaka, M. Nakano.
Testing: K. Tuchiya, K. Yamaji

5) Process of the development


At the early stage also a 650 cc 2 stroke twin was considered next to the 4 stroke twin. But the 2 stroke was banned because of the unfavourable exhaust note. The project was officially commenced in August 1967.



The first pre-prototype was a 650 cc engine installed in the R1 (350 cc) chassis and as target bike "Triumph" was chosen from between Triumph, BSA and Norton for further styling reference.

Therefore the feeling of maneuverability and easy handling were developed based upon Triumph. The first prototype was built during the Spring of 1968. Until the end of 1969 a 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th prototype were built and 2.500 design modifications sheets were issued!

In the Autumn of 1969 most of the technical problems were solved and the machine was ready for production.

6) Development on the technical side


The basic dimensions for the bore + stroke were taken directly from the Toyota 2000 GT sportscar (75x75x6=1998 cc), which was designed and developed by Yamaha on the request of Toyota Motor Co. The stroke was just shortened by 1 mm, giving 75x74x2=654 cc.



The design of the valve train was the first experience for Yamaha motorcycle engineers, therefore the technology was transferred from the Automobile Division in Yamaha. Although the cam arrangement was changed from DOHC (2000GT) to SOHC, the diameter of the valves, valve angle, valve stem dimension were taken over completely. For example the valve retainer is the same part as on the 2000GT.

(Note: If you are travelling in the Netherlands you can visit the Nationaal Automobile Museum in Raamsdonksveer (near 'Breda), which is owned by the Dutch Toyota Importer, and you can see the only 2000GT's in Europe and furthermore the Toyota "7" racing car, which was totally developed by Yamaha, and which has world's first twin turbo charged 5 litre V-8 racing engine).


The difference between the automobile engine and the motorcycle engine was the rpm at max. power, so some parts had to be changed to tougher material and also finally the valve lift was changed from 6.5 mm to 8.0 mm for higher output. The cam profile of the 2000GT was calculated in and by Toyota, so Yamaha could not use it. Yamaha developed their own calculation system for these polydyne cams.



Please consider that at that time Yamaha did not have a computer, so the IBM computer from Yamaha Musical Instruments Co. was used during the night!

As for the camshaft Yamaha had no experience with a one piece crankshaft for a 4 stroke engine therefore the same press-fit crankshaft type with identical cylinder pitch as for the YR-1 was used. But a 360 degree crank instead of the 180 degree one was used because of vibration. And where the YR-1 had a labyrinth seal between the the left and right crank, the XS carries the sprocket for the SOHC.

The crankcase were designed also horizontal-split with cast-iron inserts for the bearings, 3 roller and a ball-bearing on the right hand side. Lubrication system was wet sump type. Because of the deep crankcases, only the clutch was dipped in the oil. So the function was similar to dry sump.



The pistons were simply 2000GT pistons made of Lo-Ex material. At the beginning the cylinder head had very compact cooling fins, but these grew during development.

The transmission parts layout was taken from the YR-1, like clutch, gears, etc. As for the performance, the prototype engine gave only 20 HP. By re-working the cams by hand during the following months we got 42 HP. Finally we reached 53 HP. Oil leakage was the biggest problem in the early stages of the development, but this was fortunately cured later.


P.S. I do hope it is clear now that the anchester of the XS1 is not the Horex, (even Mr. S. Honda looked more to NSU than to Horex), but a combination of James Bonds' Toyota 2000 GT and Yamaha's own YR-1! Also Hosk did not appear at all in the scenario as some people did think.


Ludy E. Beumer, Copyright
Yamaha Motor Europe N.V.

~kop
 
Yep, read all that before; slick propaganda from an engineering team that was so experienced and sophisticated with 4-stroke motors (having designed a race car motor for Toyota and all) that they tried to put caged needle bearings on the wrist pins of the 40 c.i. beast, 2-stroke style, in the first run of XS1 motors. Dennis, you oughta be ashamed, misleading the children this way.
 
But we're reading it on the internet, it must be true, lol. What has me scratching my head is that if production ceased in 1980 like they say, where did all the '81, '82, and '83 models come from?
 
But we're reading it on the internet, it must be true, lol. What has me scratching my head is that if production ceased in 1980 like they say, where did all the '81, '82, and '83 models come from?

As KellyAnne would say......must be "alternate facts"....;)
 
I reckon that even if Yamaha did use Triumph to inspire their design they missed by a marque.
I bought my '84 Heritage Special NOS in '86 because it looked like a G9 Matchless.
And I'd never heard of Horex until years afterwards when a Christmas gift book showed me photos.
Then I realized that the XS650 looked as much like a Horex Imperator as it did a Matchless G9
even if the design wasn't purposely inspired by either machine.
 
I really don't believe any of this. The Honda CB350 and CB450 were the best selling competition to beat, or at least take away some of the market share at the beginning. Too far away from that styling would have been too much of a gamble.

Scott
 
Styling?! I'm talkin' alien technology here, folks--as in alien to Yamaha's iron both before and after. Where else in Yamaha's line do we find brass screen "filters" in the lube system; sprung primary gear to damp the drive train instead of a cush hub; no mechanical balancer on the 4-stroke motor's crank; and yes, 360* firing order. Do ya think maybe, just maybe, that stuff wound up on the XS650 because Yamaha already had the plans and tooling lying around after acquiring same by buying out Showa (who got it by buying out Hosk, who got it by buying out Horex), and wanted to put a machine with a low price point on the road in a hurry? Bottom line--the XS650 motor shows 1950's technology from top to bottom and resembles no Yamaha in-house design because it wasn't.

And the price point was low indeed. I was selling Hondas when the XS1 came out, and Yamaha sold 'em for $50 more than a CB450 where I lived. Wow--just $50 for another 200 ccs! IMO that didn't buy $50 more motorcycle, but that was a hard point to get across.
 
From the Dutch XS650 Club Site...........History link. The site page states the XS650 was taken out of production in 1985.....................I have numerous confirmations on model ID's from the US, Oceania, Canada and Europe and these models vin plates/stickers state they were made after 1980.................
Dutch xs650 site.png
 
grizld1, ha, alien technology, aint that the truth. I'm still being shocked by the things that I find in this design that I've never seen before. I'm sure Yamaha had a few Hondas around for reverse engineering, so, why go in such different directions? I'm also sure that Honda had a few Volkswagon beetles around when designing the GoldWings, the fuel gauge sender, instrument electrics and other things are direct copies of the VW.

Scott
 
~snip Dennis, you oughta be ashamed, misleading the children this way.

Dick you should have known a punchline was on the way .
1957hosk.jpg


1955_Horex_500cc.jpg




Well it is a bit of a convoluted story beginning with YaMoCo absorbing Showa . Now in the above two photos I'll just have you make up your own mind . With one hint . Guess who designed the front suspension for the Hosk ? Guess who Hosk copied ? YaMoCo saw the potential of the 125cc disc valve two strokes of Showa in the 1959 GP season and subsequently absorbed Showa acquiring their engineering in 1960 , introducing their own disc valve multi cylinder racers in 1961.

Daimler-Benz took over Horex in 1960 and motorcycle production was terminated. That effectively ends any portion of Horex in this story . Or does it ?

"Horex, in Germany, designed a 500cc SOHC vertical twin that was thoroughly modern in concept and execution. The impecunious and enthusiastic engineer of Hosk in Japan made an Oriental version of the Horex. The Hosk was rather expensive - and fast. It was the only Japanese bike that could challenge the English singles and twins for performance. Eventually Hosk’s constant cash-flow difficulties delivered them to the arms of Showa, which continued to produce an improved version of the Hosk (many of the Hosk engineers went to work for Showa when they took over the Hosk factory). Showa sold to Yamaha in 1960 and the old Horex-inspired 500 twin went with it. Before the sale, the same engineers who had copied the Horex designed a 650cc version of the Hosk which incorporated all that they had learned during the ten years of production of the 500cc version."

~Joe Minton

So the correct history may even include a footnote to Makayasu Nakamura and the RD56 development .
At the time YaMoCo had not the slightest interest in producing a 650cc upright twin four stroke . They just wanted to do battle with Suzuki and Honda and needed ammunition .Nakamura came with Showa to YaMaCo to do battle with Suzuki's acqusition of rider and all but engineer Ernst Degner from MZ and all the two stroke technology that came with him. Honda still was a formidable presence with it's mini-multi four valve four strokes as well. Then there is the well publicized row between Phil Reed and Bill Ivy , the RD56A the RD05A , RA131 ...

Now, just in case anyone is interested in where Kawasaki fits in here . They don't . Through these years Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI) was doing just that . From ship building to aviation to infrastructure engineering they were undeniably busy . KHI for years had no interest in motorcycles . Even when they did produce a motorcycle anything like the the XS650 it was the W series originating in 1965 . Less said the better about that .

So it pays (or doesn't in this case) to know your history . Dick , you had to know the punchline was coming.

~kop
 
I did know it was coming, Dennis, yes indeedy, just had to yank your chain a little while I waited for it. Those Dutchmen can get mighty strident on the subject, though, can't they? How much did Kawasaki wind up paying BSA for patent infringement, anyway? Don't think I've ever seen the numbers.
 
I did know it was coming, Dennis, yes indeedy, just had to yank your chain a little while I waited for it. Those Dutchmen can get mighty strident on the subject, though, can't they? How much did Kawasaki wind up paying BSA for patent infringement, anyway? Don't think I've ever seen the numbers.
had a kaw 650 w1 for a while , was intresting to say the lest comparing to a bsa , heard that after bsa took them to world court and won was still able to be produced in japan for internal use only for a few yrs after , never tried but except for the imperial and metric threads parts were suppose to be interchangible , mine also leaked oil like a bsa.. longest ride on it (bit of a rat bike ) was from cairns to bris (in 1982...2000 kls / 1200 miles) never missed a beat , police in qld actually bought them for a police bike (had been using bsa before so some logic ) not sure but don't think got any court awarded cash just a export ban .. today the lawyers would be able to retire on their cut .. wish still had it but when got to bris cops pulled me up on a exspired / paid traffic warrant / night in jail and next morning went to pick up the bike from side of rd ( all my clothes / tools / camping gear , every thing I owned ) bike was gone .. coppers .. bad luck, your lucky we don't do you for vagrancy now fk off
 
Back
Top