Better to have re-phased and lost than never to have re-phased at all

mrriggs

XS650 Junkie
Messages
679
Reaction score
94
Points
28
Location
Vancouver, WA
You don't truly appreciate what you have until it's gone. I recently switched back to a standard firing order after riding the re-phase for a couple years. The bottom end of the re-phase was tired, wrist pins crying to get out. I had a stock bottom end that I could drop in while I rebuilt the re-phase.

This was a great opportunity to see how much difference just a re-phase can make. When I originally built the re-phase, it was replacing a worn out stock engine. I also upgraded to a 256 cam and flatslide carbs so it was impossible to compare. This time I used the same pistons, jugs, head, cam grind, and carbs. Cam timing, ignition timing, and carb jetting all the same. For all accounts, this is the same motor but with a stock firing order.

I honestly didn't expect such a huge difference.

To be quite frank, I hate it. The 360 is completely soulless. It sounds like a damn thumper. It doesn't excite me like the re-phase. Exhaust notes are like music, everyone has their favorite tune. To me, a 90° v-twin is audible perfection.

Speaking of sound... The 360 seems much quieter. When I switched to the re-phase originally, I noticed it was louder but assumed that was because of the bigger cam. This time I am running the same cam as the 277 and it doesn't sound as loud. This is simply an observation, I really have no opinion either way on which is better.

The 360 doesn't seem to rev up as fast as the 277 but this may only be perception. It still gets up and boogies but the lifeless drone of the 360 firing order doesn't evoke the same feeling of brutal acceleration as the growl from the 277.

The one characteristic of the 360 that I welcome back is the vibration. I learned to get used to the buzzy vibe of the 277 because I liked the sound of it so much. The throbbing vibe of the 360 does make the bike jump around a bit when parked, but going down the road it [to me] is more pleasant than the re-phase.

I will live with this motor until my re-phased [big bore:wink2:] motor is done, but this will be the last 360 ever to go into my bike. It's funny, I had no complaints about this bike before I re-phased it. If I hadn't tried the re-phase, I would still be motoring along merrily with even firing intervals. But now that I've experienced it, I just can't go back.
 
what a total crock of shit. Maybe the Biggest crock of shit I've read here so far.
 
The one characteristic of the 360 that I welcome back is the vibration. I learned to get used to the buzzy vibe of the 277 because I liked the sound of it so much. The throbbing vibe of the 360 does make the bike jump around a bit when parked, but going down the road it [to me] is more pleasant than the re-phase.

Mrriggs, could you explain this better/more?

My first thought towards that comment is, the 360 is more a consistent vibe, vs the 277 is more of a vibe higher up in rpm/as you go though the gears?
 
Mrriggs, could you explain this better/more?

My first thought towards that comment is, the 360 is more a consistent vibe, vs the 277 is more of a vibe higher up in rpm/as you go though the gears?

I'm not sure how else to explain it. The 360 is rhythmic where the 277 is a brash buzzy feeling. It's not a matter of "how much" it vibrates as it is about "how" it vibrates. Even if the 277 technically vibrates less, I don't like the way it vibrates.

That's really the point of this entire thread. It's an opinion piece. Opinions that I've based off of real world experience. More importantly, opinions based largely on emotion. Because, when the rubber meets the road, that's all that matters. If you don't enjoy the ride then what's the point.
 
what a total crock of shit. Maybe the Biggest crock of shit I've read here so far.

The biggest crock of shit is you high jacking this thread of which you have no personal experience on the inherited difference of the 277 or 270 vs the stock 360 firing. Due to the difference of off setting rotational masses of the rephasing,less effort is needed in assisting the opposing piston through it's cycle,thus allowing a wider operating PRM range while reducing engine stress.

So what have you contributed to the 650 community? Mr Riggs resume trumps you by leaps and bounds when it comes to contributions,thus giving him the edge and for you to take notes.
 
The one characteristic of the 360 that I welcome back is the vibration. I learned to get used to the buzzy vibe of the 277 because I liked the sound of it so much. The throbbing vibe of the 360 does make the bike jump around a bit when parked, but going down the road it [to me] is more pleasant than the re-phase.

I will live with this motor until my re-phased [big bore:wink2:] motor is done, but this will be the last 360 ever to go into my bike. It's funny, I had no complaints about this bike before I re-phased it. If I hadn't tried the re-phase, I would still be motoring along merrily with even firing intervals. But now that I've experienced it, I just can't go back.

Interesting take on the vibes.

Nice to hear your thoughts on this as well.


what a total crock of shit. Maybe the Biggest crock of shit I've read here so far.



Drinking that anti freeze again

Yyyyyyyyyyaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwwnnnnnnn.
 
Due to the difference of off setting rotational masses of the rephasing,less effort is needed in assisting the opposing piston through it's cycle,thus allowing a wider operating PRM range while reducing engine stress.

I know they work without it, Hugh has done dozens, but shouldn't the crank really be rebalanced to eliminate this vibration and take full advantage of the rephase? You are basically rephasing a crank that was balanced to be a 360 degree motor. :confused:
 
This is the first useful write up that would have me even consider a rephase, nice work Mr riggs
 
I did a lot of reading when I bought my re-phase pistons and ended up with some 700cc racing pistons from Hoos. I bought them because at the time I was convinced that their weight was going to give me a smoother engine. Unfortuntately I read thousands of posts and can never remember where the good stuff is when I need to reference it agian. It should be running in a month or so.
 
I know they work without it, Hugh has done dozens, but shouldn't the crank really be rebalanced to eliminate this vibration and take full advantage of the rephase? You are basically rephasing a crank that was balanced to be a 360 degree motor. :confused:

Thats an excellent point Okie. Of all the rephase discussion I've read, this is the first I've seen this brought up.

I know race motors get rebalanced when they are built... seems they should be rebalanced any time the crank is split... or at least checked.
 
Interesting write up mrriggs. I have a re-phased crank for a motor I never finished putting together. I do like the way the 360 vibrates. Yesterday I was observing the bike on the side stand. Sitting there trembling like it was excited and ready for the ride. I liked the look. I never thought the vibration was excessive on the 360 motor to start with. Some day when time and money permits I will finsh building the 277 and find out. What is your assessment of the 277 at back road cruse speed say 3000 to 3500 RPM smooth or Jerky like the Harley motor.
 
Ideally yes, you would rebalance the crank when you rephase (material would be removed from the counterweight side of the crank). In reality the xs650's solid rods and bearings make that a difficult task so nobody does it. There's actually no reason to believe your crank was ideal for the 360 either, it just too tough to measure for anyone to bother checking.

The counterweight of the crank can never cancel the vibes of course, it only redirects them. In particular it reduces the up and down motion of the engine by increasing the motion in other directions. Heavier pistons on the stock weight crank may push the balance factor towards a "theoretically" correct percentage, but they're also heavier and it's the weight of the piston that's causing the vibes in the first place. Starting off with more vibes, but getting a little more favourable redirection of them... if anyone could tell you which side of better/worse that ball would drop on they should ride directly to the nearest casino.
 
I know they work without it, Hugh has done dozens, but shouldn't the crank really be rebalanced to eliminate this vibration and take full advantage of the rephase? You are basically rephasing a crank that was balanced to be a 360 degree motor. :confused:

The whole rotating assembly should be re-balanced but it's very expensive. Heavier rods and pistons for the rephase, theoretically should but the B- factor towards the 50% rule plus longer rods also assist in reducing the vibes to a certain degree by extending the dwell time as the crank journal moves past TDC,this is a known fact by a fella named Jim Schmidt(spelling) who sells long rod and piston kits for Norton's.
 
Thats an excellent point Okie. Of all the rephase discussion I've read, this is the first I've seen this brought up.

Perhaps you missed this thread.

http://www.xs650.com/forum/showthread.php?t=19680&highlight=wagging

Dynamic balancing an XS crank is unnecessary. If you static balanced each crank web when it is disassembled then you will achieve a better balance than if it were dynamic balanced as a whole. This is one advantage of assembled cranks. One piece cranks have to be dynamically balanced because there is no way to isolate each plane for static balancing.
 
Back
Top