Well, the particular display of tail feathers that you're referencing isn't so much philosophy as it is heavily diluted, de-tuned, adulterated, half-truth, front stoop, hand-me-down cognitive theory. The undeniable expertise there is
motorcycles. Hence, it's usually best when people stick to espousing disciplines in which they are qualified, as there is always the risk of innocently tottering into the back yard of a career behavioral scientist and being caught midstream in an ill-informed piss. That is what has happened in this instance. Ignorance is learned - quite correct - but it can be unlearned as well. Each of us here is ignorant of something bike-related, which is why we are all here. I brought my motorcycle ignorance here with me in 2007, and still tote a lot of it about, not so proudly, but I'm trying to discard it bit by bit over time. For my part, I learn much more readily when I am not being branded as evolutionary refuse.
You have posted about 6 times as I write this, I see. Keep asking questions. But one thing I'd suggest you do is either try every fix that is suggested, or cover your rationale as to why you have not. My experience here has taught me that what frustrates prospective helpers more than just about anything is having to try to "plug holes" in what remedies someone has tried, and what they have not. In social media, where we are all captive to the written word and its inherent failings, this is mainly a function of communication proficiency and timing, but if someone mentions something such as float levels, needles or needle jets, try to cover that in your reply so the helper knows where you are. Don't ask me how I know this.
And welcome here!
TC
