SE Road King
XS650 Enthusiast
Can a bad intake valve seal cause a significant oil ingestation on an '80 XS650 to give the appearance of high oil consumption?
I got a stock '80 XS650SG this past spring, cheap. The engine is out of the frame and the top end is stripped down. I inventoried the half-dozen or so boxes and cofee cans to my satisfaction that I was getting a whole bike.
The seller said that he was given the bike some years ago because his friend was no longer interested in it . I asked why it was torn down and the reply was "to re-sleeve the bores". I also asked the seller if the bike was burning oil, low on compression, was it running,,, ETC. and every response was "I don't have and idea why. So I made a decision to purchase it knowing that "resleveing the bores was just an un informed term that was not even possible on this paticular engine.
So now I sit to interpet what possibly had been the reason for stripping the engine. I measured the bores in 7 locations along the ring and skirt stroke areas of the bores both perpendicular and parrell with the crank journal axis, I measured the pistions and grooves and the cross-section of the rings. Pin fits are fine. All oil grooves and ports are fine. Valve seats/fits are in very good condition as are the stem clearances. Valve guide seals are always suspect on air cooled engines, but did fit the stems well and were seated properly. The cam is un molested. The evidence is that the surfaces and clearances, piston and ring condition and valve seats were all well with in serviceability limits. The only flaw was that the #2 cylinder intake valve had the compression spring around the top of the guide seal was missing. The carbon build up in the #2 combustion chamber was dark and soft compared to the left one, but that could have been from post tear down contamination.
I am wondering why a novice would attempt to re sleeve the bores, I lable the previous owner novice because he used the term "re sleeve". I have to think that the owner had witnessed burning oil from the exhaust and low power. If he had done a compression check first I am convinced that he would have seen satisfactory pressures. The fits are just too good. So good that it could go back together. I will break the glaze in the bores, cross-hatch the walls, lap the valves, re ring and reseal.
So, again I ask:
Can a single bad intake valve seal cause a significant oil ingestation on an '80 XS650 to give the owner justification to tear the engine down?
I could see if all of the valve seals were worn enough or have had age set to the point of sucking enough oil to justify the tear down. But it would have had to be all of them and the valve seals could have been repaired in the frame, I would think.
I do believe that there were a whole lot of "poor vehichle maintenance" owner/riders out there in the day as these things were reletivly cheap and in a way disposable to the diluted/green biker of the day. I am betting that a carb sync, valve adjustment and thourough servicing would have put a lot of these bikes back on the road.
I understand the term "re-sleeve the cylinder" was commonly used to identefy repairs nessesary to restore compression, and power and repair oil blow-by and piston slap.
Have you any theory to review given the evidence I've reported. I get that there would be a host of reasons for repairs that included removing the engine, but, the owner said "to re-sleeve the bores"
I got a stock '80 XS650SG this past spring, cheap. The engine is out of the frame and the top end is stripped down. I inventoried the half-dozen or so boxes and cofee cans to my satisfaction that I was getting a whole bike.
The seller said that he was given the bike some years ago because his friend was no longer interested in it . I asked why it was torn down and the reply was "to re-sleeve the bores". I also asked the seller if the bike was burning oil, low on compression, was it running,,, ETC. and every response was "I don't have and idea why. So I made a decision to purchase it knowing that "resleveing the bores was just an un informed term that was not even possible on this paticular engine.
So now I sit to interpet what possibly had been the reason for stripping the engine. I measured the bores in 7 locations along the ring and skirt stroke areas of the bores both perpendicular and parrell with the crank journal axis, I measured the pistions and grooves and the cross-section of the rings. Pin fits are fine. All oil grooves and ports are fine. Valve seats/fits are in very good condition as are the stem clearances. Valve guide seals are always suspect on air cooled engines, but did fit the stems well and were seated properly. The cam is un molested. The evidence is that the surfaces and clearances, piston and ring condition and valve seats were all well with in serviceability limits. The only flaw was that the #2 cylinder intake valve had the compression spring around the top of the guide seal was missing. The carbon build up in the #2 combustion chamber was dark and soft compared to the left one, but that could have been from post tear down contamination.
I am wondering why a novice would attempt to re sleeve the bores, I lable the previous owner novice because he used the term "re sleeve". I have to think that the owner had witnessed burning oil from the exhaust and low power. If he had done a compression check first I am convinced that he would have seen satisfactory pressures. The fits are just too good. So good that it could go back together. I will break the glaze in the bores, cross-hatch the walls, lap the valves, re ring and reseal.
So, again I ask:
Can a single bad intake valve seal cause a significant oil ingestation on an '80 XS650 to give the owner justification to tear the engine down?
I could see if all of the valve seals were worn enough or have had age set to the point of sucking enough oil to justify the tear down. But it would have had to be all of them and the valve seals could have been repaired in the frame, I would think.
I do believe that there were a whole lot of "poor vehichle maintenance" owner/riders out there in the day as these things were reletivly cheap and in a way disposable to the diluted/green biker of the day. I am betting that a carb sync, valve adjustment and thourough servicing would have put a lot of these bikes back on the road.
I understand the term "re-sleeve the cylinder" was commonly used to identefy repairs nessesary to restore compression, and power and repair oil blow-by and piston slap.
Have you any theory to review given the evidence I've reported. I get that there would be a host of reasons for repairs that included removing the engine, but, the owner said "to re-sleeve the bores"