I prefer the STOCK tci. Why? Its simple, It gives the most acurate timing.
I don't think anyone disputes that. It's also provably tough, since there are many 30+ years old bikes on the road still running it. If i could find a NOS unit, i would snap it up and put it on my '78 in a second.
Now before you all get up in feathers, really think about this. It triggers off the crankshaft wolla perfect timing. THE REST go from the cam chain ( assumably it is always in perfect adjustment), then through the mechanical advance (which we know is always in perfect order and has perfect springs) and finaly to the trigger. Do the homework guys the stock tci is by all practical purposes the most accurate.
Already acknowledged. However, you're not including any of the points models, for which it's a definite upgrade.
If boyer and or pamco really wanted to do up a ignition right they would use 80 up rotor and stator and trigger from the crankshaft.
I can't speak for why boyer didn't do that, since AFIAK, the boxes are smart enough to have an advance curve built in. (but i imagine keeping costs low was the impetus).
Pamco, however, has the goal of simplicity and being inexpensive. Electronic pickup is indisputably better than points, and Pete's goal in designing the unit was simply to replace the points as an ignition pickup.
THE BIGGEST PROBLAM I RUN INTO WITH POINTS BIKES IS NOT THE POINTS BUT THE ADVANCE UNIT.
That's... Odd? Can you expound on what issues you found so difficult with the advance unit? And it's a little off your talking point (TCI) if you start talking about the advance unit... Something TCI doesn't have.
So all you boyer guys out there slam that, (I KNOW YOU WILL TRY TO JUSTIFY YOUR PURCHASE).
I would imagine a lot of the time it's a simple matter of availability and cost. If there are no TCI units on ebay, it's hard to replace it, at any cost. When there are, the cost difference between something brand new with a guarantee vs something that may not even work when it arrives at your door is often negligible. And the cost difference for a Pamco full kit vs just Boyer one is less than 1/2, IIRC.
So, the core point of your argument is "crank timing is more accurate than cam timing". Agreed. And if a TCI broke, and a kit existed to replace it that took crank timing vs cam timing, i'd have to carefully think about any cost differences being worth it. But there aren't.
I'm with you on those who simply replace their TCI's that are working. I'm not sure why they do it, except as i mentioned above - it's 30 years old. As it ages, it's going to be more and more likely to blow up, on average. I'm sure there will be people puttering around another 30 years from now still running TCI, but they'll be the exception.
Back to you, hit me with the caps locked passive aggressive absolutism, baby.