here's a thought: one reason that more recent music seems so un-distinctive is that at this point it's all just being re-chewed.
Think about what happened musically in the USA starting with I dunno exactly, but let's say ragtime music, then you get jazz and blues mixed in, then country gets mixed in and it all equaled something like a musical tsunami, being surfed by a thing called rock and roll. Then in the 60's you get the brit influence mixed in TOO. Then mid 70's it started to stop, lol. Musicians burned out and all the new stuff by late 70's onward was a continual re-hashing of that huge, distinctive "wave" - which I don't think will ever happen again on this planet - the great
wave that happened mostly in the USA in the 20th century.
I don't see anything that outrageously original ever happening again. Partly
because of the internet, satellite radio, etc. Nobody has to hide under the covers at night, tuning in some far away station that plays blues or whatever.
We're definitely "running rich" in the music dept and as a result it seems things are mushy.
It's all re-hash. Some of it is FANTASTICALLY great re-hash, but it is re-hash.
Funny, it seems it's almost come full-circle, in that if you want to hear something gritty, you pretty much HAVE to go out and find some under-paid band playing live - like in the 50's juke-joint days.
Seems like some TV series feature good music by new bands, but it all sounds like rehashed stuff, too. Like the show WEEDS - great soundtrack! mostly current artists and good listening - but there's nothing really groundbreaking there.
I don't think there's any ground TO break right now.
ok sorry I went on and on - I'm bored outta my head at work. This seemed like a good bone to chew.
ps: I had the pleasure of seeing Richard Thompson playing live with his electric trio a few weeks ago. Wow!!!! now that's one dude that didn't slow down..... wicked band