...My point is that a lot of manuals and info in the 70's and early 80's were written for the tech who hadn't ever been trained. Like HonTec, MMI, AMI or whatever they're called. IMO if the 78 manual was written today for exactly the same bike with todays trained techs, OEM tools, etc the procedures would be different.
You'll notice todays OEM manuals are written without the simple procedures "how to check cable free play" etc because it's written for a competent tech.
Honda had training facilities back in the early '70s, following the mantra "Sell the customer what he needs, not what he wants".
Yes, I've seen a disturbing trend in the evolution of manuals and schematics spanning from the '60s to the 2000's. Motorcycle manuals for asian imports back then were often oddly translated renditions similar to the strange Chinese instructions found with import gadgets. Automotive manuals, on the other hand, provided a lot of 'theory of operation' for various components, like a complete description of how the internals of a Delco alternator worked, or the hows and whys of setting the critical advance curves of distributors. Folks back then seemed to have a better grasp of how and why things worked.
I've found the modern manuals omit these 'theory of operations', and have supplanted them with endless repetitions of "disconnect battery negative ground" plus other idiot-proofing disclaimers of safety, to satisfy an ever-increasing litigious business environment.
Schematics can be classed in three systems:
Logical - Where the circuit layout reveals the logic and functional understanding of how things work.
Physical - The wiring layout for specific vehicle regions or zones. Attuned for factory assemblers and techs trying to find connectors and such.
Harness - The actual loom layout, attuned to harness manufacturing.
Older manuals showed 'logical' schematics, which greatly aids understanding in diagnosis. You're on your own to find the connectors.
Newer manuals show the 'physical' schematics, you can quickly find the connectors. But, unless you know what's the problem, or successfully follow the cookbook troubleshooting charts, about all you can do is replace parts until it's fixed. Parts departments love this, sells more parts.
Newer automotive manuals have to include an ever-increasing array of ancillary systems that don't relate to the primary purpose of the vehicle, like emissions, air-bag safety equipment, exotic convenience gadgetry, 12-speaker sound systems, security, ...etc. Today's tech has a much higher taskload on these newer vehicles.
But, the trend I've been seeing here is a move away from 'understanding and repairing' to automatons that simply replace parts. A shrewd business strategy.
A good example is that questionable practice of putting grease on float valves. You don't know why, but do it anyway because that's what you were taught.
Sorry, funky.
Thread hijacks like this are probably best put in their own thread...