What a croc of shit Hooser.
I have nothing to do with Petes Ignition. I made a pamco thread with extracts from threads with information relating to the pamco and the thread had a PMA component. All of this was to help the members and the site. In fact i PM'd Pete to get his input so i could add any of those details that may have been missing and he didn't reply to my PM. I watched Pamco threads and added any new info as it was displayed, and linked all the threads i gleamed information from and to be fair and without bias, i also posted warnings, problems and solutions that had arisen and links to those threads as well. These problems were due to manufacturing and some part failures, like an unsoldered wire or broken component. These were quite rare, but when trouble shooting it would be prudent to check first and something to be considered.
There was so many threads with questions on installation and problems. Largest area of problems related to installations from the PMA crowd who were doing HHB PMA's and Pamco's at the same time. Not reading the instructions properly and repeated threads on the same question, from a time when this site was getting so many new threads by new members daily, it was almost impossible to keep up.
RG and i made some points about the lack of truth in advertising from PMA manufacturers or sellers to push PMA products. This you took exception to and in the course of the argument your manufacture, (after you contacted them about our concerns), changed the wording on their site in response to the outing of the publishing of false statements they were displaying.
This is all factual and can be verified by looking the threads still on here.
If some one asks about an ignition system and the Pamco hasn't been put forward i will post a link to the Pamco thread with all the information, good and bad, so an informed decision can be made. as for the latest thread you are referring about, it was in an established thread and after you had posted about you PMA and Peanut the Boyer. I posted a link to the updated Pamco with it's combined E-Advance and after i had done that you again posted a link to you and your PMA's........sound business for sure because it keeps it to the forefront of the conversation and drowns out alternatives.
For the record i have also posted you and your PMA as an alternative to HHB PMA due to the quality of a European product compared to the problems of the HHB PMA and the associated components.........
Again all of this information i have posted above can be verified..................not like your statements about me and my supposed payed involvement in the pushing and avocation Pamcopetes products, or the claim, (deleted posts by you
http://www.xs650.com/threads/new-ignition-system.38366/ in this thread when 5twins disputed your negative response to the Pamcos), that the Pamco is a work in process and may become a good product when it is finally finished