I feel like Grasshopper in Kung Fu. In awe, over my head, but still learning.
Thank you again for sharing.
Thank you again for sharing.
I was alright until the flow ratings went on , they mean nothing to me, but I'm not an engineer.I feel like Grasshopper in Kung Fu. In awe, over my head, but still learning.
Thank you again for sharing.
By raising the floor you accomplish several things, you reduce the cross sectional at the short turn increasing port velocity and along the roof long sideI was alright until the flow ratings went on , they mean nothing to me, but I'm not an engineer.
The bit I am a bit confused with is the size of the port, I has assumed the d was coming up from the base the increase velocity as everyone keeps saying the ports are over size to begin with,
I have no idea how to send that video from phone,I'll try to up load to YT but it's slow a processThumbs crossed this time all went well! Please let us see a video from your benchwork
I will tryVery nice news In regards to the video you can try to use the service from wetransfer.com. It should work from your phone. As reciver you can fill my mail address. I will then prepare the video for upload to this thread. Or you go the YouTube route, that should make the vid immortal. How you like it
7. countercheck. Goal ist there is the same distance on points/advance side between cover < -- > sealing surface head (in this Photo the bearings are not fully in line with cam, in this stage of assembly they should be as near as possible to the cam)
Well, since this is a performance engine, I'm assuming that's an aftermarket cam? I've measured 2 stock setups now, and with both side covers fully seated, you can't fit a .002" feeler between the covers and the bearings... and yes, the covers should fully seat. With a gap between the head and covers, I'd be concerned about sealing of both the mating surfaces and the cam end seal. I'll see if I can dig up some pics.Great write up spungle! Jim, mebbie link to this?